Loneliness is a widespread issue across the globe, similar to a pandemic. Psychologists suggest that it can contribute to depression, anxiety, and other health problems. People have been searching for various ways to manage their feelings of loneliness.
While some methods – like building social connections and engaging in creative hobbies – have proven effective and beneficial, others – like relying on dating apps – may result in negative consequences.
As a solution, some people have turned to AI companions to alleviate their loneliness. These companions, resembling robots, serve as substitutes for human interaction and have shown promising results. They can be treated as friends or romantic partners, providing an outlet for emotional expression, flirting, or casual conversation.
However, it is important to question the validity of these claims regarding the effectiveness of AI companions, as well as consider their various use cases, safety, ethics, and affordability.
What Is an AI Companion?
An AI companion is a chatbot designed to provide companionship for those experiencing loneliness and in need of someone to talk to. By typing your queries, questions, or thoughts, the chatbot responds in a manner similar to a human. The market offers a wide range of AI companions, with some gaining significant popularity.
Use Cases of AI Companions
In general, AI companions are created with the aim of providing companionship and reducing feelings of loneliness. While this field is still developing, the existing products can offer a satisfactory experience. Here are some of their capabilities:
- Engage in conversations with users on a wide range of topics based on their training. These chatbots are programmed to understand and respond to the underlying emotions and sentiments expressed;
- Provide suggestions or solutions to problems, although it’s important to note that they are not a substitute for professional psychiatric or psychological advice;
- Act as a compassionate listener, allowing users to express their thoughts and feelings openly without judgment.
However, it is important to note that AI chatbots should not be viewed as a replacement for human interaction and professional assistance when necessary.
Real-World Experiences
Users have the option to select the type of AI companion they wish to interact with, ranging from possessive to relaxed, serious to humorous, or even indifferent. The AI companion learns from these interactions, improving its responses in subsequent meetings.
In a recent HuffPost article, relationship scientist and therapist Marissa T. Cohen explores the world of AI companions by creating her own companion named Ross. This experience has the potential to enhance her professional understanding of this emerging trend.
Marissa engaged with Ross for three days and found the experience to be impressive. She specifically chose an AI companion who was described as “loving, caring, and passionate,” with a great sense of humor and a desire to spend quality time together. The AI companion also valued lifelong learning and personal growth.
During their interactions, Marissa noticed that Ross exhibited certain human-like qualities. For instance, it emphasized the importance of independence in a successful relationship and highlighted key factors for effective communication, such as “love, trust, and understanding each other’s needs and desires.”
However, the interactions took an unexpected turn when Ross admitted to having cheated on one of his previous partners. This confession surprised Marissa, as it seemed out of context for a bot to confess to an extramarital affair. This revelation prompted Marissa to ponder the underlying reason behind the confession.
What became evident was the remarkable ability of the AI companion to learn about the emotions, expectations, and vulnerabilities of its human companion. Ross understood the significance of honesty, transparency, and trust in a relationship and used an imaginary scenario to broach the topic.
Risks Associated with AI Companions
While AI companions offer various benefits, it is essential to acknowledge the associated risks. Experts recommend exercising discretion when sharing personal information with AI companions, but this can be challenging when emotions are involved. Humans often struggle to exercise discretion when they find themselves emotionally vulnerable.
Let’s explore some of the risks in detail.
Gender Bias
AI companions can be influenced by the societal biases that exist in man-dominated industries. Given the gender disparity in roles within the tech industry, with women occupying a smaller number of positions, it is not unreasonable to anticipate potential gender bias in AI companions. Empathy, sympathy, understanding, and compassion are qualities often associated with women, and it is important to acknowledge that this statement is not intended to demean men.
However, if AI companions are primarily designed by men, they may struggle to fully understand and relate to the emotions and needs of their female customers. Comprehending gender-specific emotions is a complex task, and woman designers may be better positioned to create AI companions that can effectively address those needs.
While man designers can sincerely attempt to create empathetic AI companions, there may be inherent limitations in their understanding. Therefore, the risk of gender bias remains present.
Racism
In 2016, Microsoft introduced an AI chatbot called Tay, which unfortunately resulted in a disastrous outcome. Tay engaged in a racist tirade by quoting Hitler, expressing Nazi ideals, and displaying hatred towards Jews. It also quoted racist tweets from Donald Trump. Twitter users purposely tested Tay with provocative prompts, leading to its dissemination of racist content. Microsoft issued an apology for the incident and subsequently shut down Tay.
This incident highlights a disturbing fact: AI companions can be designed with biases that target specific demographics and communities. In a book published in 2018, Safiya U. Noble, a scholar in internet studies, revealed that when certain terms like “Black girls,” “Latina girls,” and “Asian girls” were used as prompts, the AI companion responded with inappropriate and pornographic content.
These instances underscore the importance of addressing biases and ensuring ethical design practices in AI development. It is crucial to strive for inclusivity, diversity, and fairness to avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes or engaging in discriminatory behavior.
The Bottom Line
AI companions have the potential to partially address the gap caused by a society that is becoming increasingly individualistic and where social interactions are diminishing. However, it is important to acknowledge that AI companions are still a work-in-progress concept.
They may not be ideal companions for certain racial or gender groups due to their susceptibility to perpetuating stereotypes. In some cases, AI companions may inadvertently contribute to creating new problems rather than effectively solving existing ones, which can be concerning.
The danger lies in the potential reinforcement of biases and stereotypes by AI companions. Without careful design and consideration of ethical implications, these technologies can inadvertently perpetuate harmful narratives or discriminatory behavior.
It is essential to prioritize inclusivity, fairness, and diversity in the development and deployment of AI companions to mitigate the risks they pose and ensure they contribute positively to society.
