Lior Eldan is the COO & Co-Founder of Moburst, a digital full-service, AI-native marketing agency.
The generative engine optimization (GEO) playbook has commoditized faster than almost any content discipline in recent years. The market moved quickly from curiosity to experimentation to integration, and now, it is standard operating procedure. Teams that had never used the term “answer engine optimization” a year ago are now building pages around featured-answer formatting, FAQ structures, schema and citation-friendly summaries.
And, of course, this matters. Clear structure helps both humans and machines understand a landing page. But once everyone applies the same structure, it stops being a differentiator. The uncomfortable truth is that many brands are still optimizing at the surface level to make content extractable, while neglecting the underlying substance. They are making content easier to quote without asking whether the content deserves to be quoted in the first place.
This creates a new challenge for leaders. You can produce a page that is technically optimized, well-formatted and easy for an AI model to summarize, yet still be invisible. This is because AI search is not only looking for signals to extract content; it’s increasingly asking, “Why should I trust this source on this specific topic?” And most content briefs were never built to answer that question.
Structure Still Matters; It Just Isn’t Enough
The first wave of GEO advice was useful because it solved a real problem. Generative engines need content they can identify, parse and use. Certain optimization methods, including adding citations and quotations, can improve visibility in generative engine responses by up to 40%.
That finding helped create the first serious play-by-play for optimizing AI search visibility. But the same research also pointed to something many teams overlook: optimization is domain-dependent. There is no universal formatting trick that turns ordinary thinking into authoritative content.
A 2025 study of 900,000 newly created webpages found that 74% contained AI-generated content. Whether a page is fully AI-written or simply AI-assisted, the effect on the market is the same: more content, produced faster, following increasingly similar patterns. When the supply of polished content explodes, polish becomes cheap and originality becomes a scarce asset.
Achieving The New Standard In AI Search
Traditional marketing briefs were built around relevance: keywords, search intent, audience needs and the core topic the content should address. While those inputs still matter, they no longer give AI search enough reason to trust, cite or prioritize a source.
A large language model may be able to summarize the consensus across 10 similar articles, repackage commonly available advice or synthesize what already exists. But what it cannot honestly manufacture is your proprietary data, like client outcomes, internal benchmarks or the judgment that comes from having actually done the work. This is the content that AI systems and human readers are both more likely to value: content that contributes something genuinely new.
Recent research finds that brands recommended by ChatGPT were 2.5 times more likely to receive a site visit within seven days than competitors that weren’t recommended. But the more revealing finding was where that traffic gets credited: 55.9% of AI-influenced visits arrived through search engines, compared with 40.4% of non-AI-influenced visits, meaning a user gets recommended a brand by AI, later searches that brand by name and shows up in analytics as ordinary branded search, with no trace of the AI recommendation that actually drove the behavior. For marketers, that distinction is critical. It means that a significant portion of the branded traffic that marketers might attribute to their awareness efforts is actually driven by customers discovering the brand through AI.
3 Questions Every Brief Should Answer
Before commissioning any strategic piece of content, leaders should ask three key questions:
1. What does this piece say that hasn’t been written before?
Content teams should be able to name the one idea, insight or proof point that makes the piece meaningfully different from what already exists. The brands that have the upper hand here will be the ones that systematically convert what they know into what the market can learn from them.
2. Who is saying it, and why are they credible?
Who says something matters, especially when the topic requires judgment rather than a generic explanation. The article needs to carry the fingerprints of someone with real exposure to the problem. And readers should walk away with an understanding of why the author is qualified to make their argument and what operational responsibility, client experience or category perspective informs their point of view.
3. What’s the proof?
Every meaningful claim in a piece should be supported. This can come in the form of credible third-party research, but the most valuable evidence often comes from the brand’s own experience, like a specific campaign result, customer trend or field-tested observation.
Vague claims get ignored because they sound like everything else, whereas specific claims create trust because they provide both readers and machines with something concrete to evaluate. And as AI search continues to shift in a fast-moving information environment, proof points should be consistently refreshed, replaced and strengthened as new data becomes available.
Content teams should also keep in mind that well-designed briefs are working in tandem with a brand’s earned media footprint. Muck Rack’s latest analysis found that earned media still drives 84% of AI citations, positioning it as a key counterpart to data and reinforcing that AI systems are looking at how a brand’s authority is shaped by the wider ecosystem of evidence around it.
The Brief Isn’t Dead
The content brief is still one of the most important tools in a marketing operation, but the version built only around keywords and formatting was designed for a search environment that has already evolved.
Today’s brief organizes production while simultaneously setting parameters for authority. And that means asking harder questions before any writing begins. In a market flooded with structurally sound content, the advantage shifts to brands with real knowledge, real proof and a real reason to be cited.
Forbes Agency Council is an invitation-only community for executives in successful public relations, media strategy, creative and advertising agencies. Do I qualify?
